Unanswered Questions
Over the years, Curry County Commissioners and other elected and appointed officials have had an aversion to responding to questions or suggestions regarding the general operation and financial health of the county. Those individuals appear to be of the opinion the citizens and electorate of Curry County work for and are accountable to them and not the other way around. Below are a variety of questions that have been directed to officials on one or more occasion on various county issues and never been answered. In most cases officials have not seen fit to respond. Answers to many of the questions are still vitally important if the county is to ever navigate out of the financial abyss it is currently in.
Town Hall Meetings - 2011
A series of three Town Hall meetings were scheduled by the commissioners to be held in June, August and October 2011.  The stated purpose of the meetings was to allow the "Community to provide input & suggestions to shape actions" of the commissioners and the future direction in which they proceeded.  Meetings were scheduled to be held in Port Orford, Gold Beach and Brookings in June, August and October for a total of nine meetings.
During the meetings in June, commissioners passed out packets consisting of 31 pages of graphs and bar charts (all in color) and presented their case why they needed more revenue.  The packet also included information on the commissioners proposal to acquire the Cape Blanco state airport.
During the June and August town hall meetings informed citizens took the commissioners at their word and provided their input. 
In August there were several Letters to the Editor about the town hall meetings.  One letter in particular from a citizen in Gold Beach  stood out with eight questions on the Cape Blanco airport and covered finances, market plans, focus groups, etc.
In fact, there was so much good, constructive dialog from engaged citizens that the commissioners NEVER held the town hall meetings in October. 
For those interested in the 31-page (color) 3.5MB document click
The Lights Are On But Nobody's Home
Picture this: The county treasurer (elected position) goes on medical leave for a month or two and the deputy treasurer agrees to come back to work after being laid off but, not without first demanding a raise.  Then a commissioner asks for information regarding major financial issues in a department for over two years and is told "now that you ask me I do have that information."  Wow, it's a good thing the question was finally phrased properly.   
Commissioner Itzen during the August 3, 2011 board of commissioner meeting:  "It's been a rocky road.  One would expect that the deputy would be trained to perform the duties of the person she's taking.  In fact, if you look at the definition of a deputy Treasurer that's exactly what is expected.  So I did contact the deputy Treasurer through our HR person and she refused to meet with me on instructions of the Treasurer."
Watch video of Itzen's explanation here 
Not to fear - commissioners later unanimously appointed the deputy to fill the vacant position of county Treasurer.
Commissioners refused to respond to questions on the subjects above.  A few of the actual questions asked follow. 
Why was an employee in this position for nearly five years when they were not competent and qualified to perform the tasks specified in their Job Description?
What authority do commissioners have over subordinates of elected officials in situations such as the one being discussed in this testimony?
Does the fact that no job descriptions or standards of conduct exist for elected officials at the county level preclude the citizens, the electorate or the elected officials of Curry County from establishing such standards?
Main Menu
Citizens' Advisory Committee Questions - December 2011
Citizens' Advisory Committee questions were briefly discussed on the Committees & Surveys page.  Following are actual questions provided to county officials in the hope their answers would assist committee members in their final recommendations.  
Curry County Finance Director: News reports in July 2011 identified several large department loans were required to "zero out" any negative balances as required by law.  The amounts reported exceed $750,000.
What are the current total cumulative negative balances (liabilities) of county departments by individual department?
ORS 294.250 requires the county governing body publish a complete list of expenditures exceeding $500 in a specific format on a monthly basis.  Is this information provided online (current & prior months) and if not, where is it provided?  
Curry County Sheriff: November 30, 2011 presentation packet provided to each committee member included a section on personnel wages which showed benefits of 40% (percent).
What is the breakdown by line item for the benefits (description and percent)?
Curry County Counsel: December 15, 2011 county counsel Herbage spoke to committee members about general subjects and a Mandated County Services - Quick Reference Guide - 2011.
What types of decisions now made by the commissioners may not be delegated to and made by others?
What categories are currently mandated and not required?
What mandated categories currently provided may be returned to the State of Oregon?
If a category is currently mandated and provided such as the 'ASSESSOR', (second category listed) does anything prohibit the services (excluding the elected official) performed within that category from being subcontracted or outsourced? 
The mandated services list may be downloaded
For those interested in the Letter to the Editor click
curry_county_taxes008016.jpg curry_county_taxes008015.jpg curry_county_taxes008014.jpg curry_county_taxes008013.jpg curry_county_taxes008012.jpg curry_county_taxes008011.jpg curry_county_taxes008010.jpg curry_county_taxes008009.jpg curry_county_taxes008008.jpg curry_county_taxes008007.jpg curry_county_taxes008006.jpg curry_county_taxes008005.jpg curry_county_taxes008004.jpg curry_county_taxes008003.jpg curry_county_taxes008002.jpg curry_county_taxes008001.jpg